Impacto de un Heart Team en pacientes con estenosis aórtica candidatos a reemplazo percutáneo / Impact of a Heart Team in patients with aortic stenosis who are candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement

RESUMEN La difusión del reemplazo valvular aórtico percutáneo (TAVI) en la estenosis aórtica (EAo) generó la creación de un Heart Team (HT), para elegir el mejor tratamiento. Existen pocos reportes sobre su utilidad. Objetivos: analizar los resultados del tratamiento de los pacientes con EAo evaluados por un HT durante 10 años Material y métodos: Inclusión consecutiva de todos los pacientes con EAo candidatos a TAVI entre enero del 2012 y julio del 2021 para seleccionar el mejor tratamiento, incluyendo además Cirugía de reemplazo valvular aórtico (CRVA) y Tratamiento médico conservador (TMC). Resultados: De 841 pacientes, se asignaron a TAVI 455 (53%), CRVA 213 (24%) y TMC 183 (23%). El porcentaje asignado a TAVI aumentó con el tiempo de 48 a 62% (p < 0,05). Los pacientes que fueron a TAVI, con respecto a los enviados a CRVA, eran mayores (86 ± 7 vs 83 ± 7 años), con mayor EUROSCORE II (6,2, IC95% 5,7-6,6 vs 5,6, IC95% 4,4-6,5) y más frágiles (1,62 ± 1 vs 0,91 ± 1), en todos los casos p <0,01. La sobrevida actuarial (IC 95%) a 1 y a 2 años fue, para TAVI 88% (84-91%) y 82% (77-86%), para CRVA 83% (76-88%) y 78% (70-84%) y para TMC 70% (60-87%) y 59% (48-68%) respectivamente (p <0,001). Conclusiones: Durante los primeros 10 años de establecido un Heart Team para la toma de decisiones en EAo, se asignaron a TAVI aproximadamente la mitad y el resto se asignó por mitades a cirugía u observación. La sobrevida de los pacientes intervenidos fue similar a 2 años y mayor que la de los no intervenidos.

ABSTRACT As transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for aortic stenosis (AS) became widespread, the need for a Heart Team (HT) arose to choose the best treatment. There are few reports regarding its usefulness. Objectives: To analyze treatment outcomes in patients with AS evaluated by a HT for 10 years. Methods: Consecutive enrollment of all patients with AS who were candidates for TAVI between January 2012 and July 2021 to choose the best treatment, including surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and conservative medical management (CMM). Results: Out of 841 patients, 455 were assigned to TAVI (53%), 213 to SAVR (24%), and 183 to CMM (23%). The percentage assigned to TAVI has increased from 48% to 62% over time (p <0.05). Patients who underwent TAVI versus those who underwent SAVR were older (86 ± 7 vs. 83 ± 7 years), had a higher EUROSCORE II (6.2, 95% CI 5.7-6.6 vs. 5.6; 95% CI 4.4-6.5) and were frailer (1.62 ± 1 vs. 0.91 ± 1), in all cases p <0.01. Actuarial survival (95% CI) at 1 and 2 years was 88% (84-91%) and 82% (77-86%) for TAVI, 83% (76-88%) and 78% (70-84%) for SAVR, and 70% (60-87%) and 59% (48-68%) for CMM, respectively (p <0.001). Conclusions: For the first 10 years after a Heart Team was established for AS decision-making, approximately half of the patients were assigned to TAVI, and the rest were equally assigned in halves to either surgery or observation. Survival for patients who received interventions was similar at 2 years and higher than in those who did not.

Impacto de la diabetes mellitus en pacientes tratados con angioplastia coronaria / Impact diabetes mellitus in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

RESUMEN Introducción: La diabetes mellitus (DM) se ha asociado a un incremento en los resultados adversos en pacientes tratados con angioplastia coronaria (ATC), en comparación con los pacientes no diabéticos. Objetivos: Evaluar el riesgo de eventos cardiovasculares mayores en los pacientes diabéticos, estratificados según el tratamiento recibido (no insulinorrequirientes o insulinorrequirientes), en una población de pacientes no seleccionada tratados con angioplastia coronaria. Material y métodos: Análisis de registro, unicéntrico y retrospectivo de pacientes con enfermedad coronaria tratados con ATC desde marzo 2009 a junio 2018, según la presencia de DM estratificada de acuerdo con el tratamiento establecido para el control del desorden metabólico en: DM insulino-requirientes (DM-IR) y DM no insulino-requirientes (DM-NIR). Se aplicó un modelo de regresión de Cox ajustado para evaluar la relación entre la presencia de diabetes y el riesgo de eventos cardiovasculares mayores. Resultados: Se incluyeron 6.313 pacientes (seguimiento promedio 4,1 ± 1,8 años), con una prevalencia global de DM del 22,8% (DM-NIR 19,1%; DM-IR 3,8%). Los pacientes diabéticos presentaron un perfil de riesgo elevado, particularmente los DM-IR. Al seguimiento promedio, el riesgo ajustado de eventos cardiovasculares mayores fue similar entre los pacientes No-DM y los DM-NIR (HR 1,02 [0,81-1,27], p 0,85). En relación con los pacientes DM-IR, se observó un riesgo elevado comparados con los No-DM (HR 1,73 [1,20-2,49], p 0,003) y con los DM-NIR (HR 1,65 [1,10-2,48], p 0,015). Se observó una interacción significativa entre el estado diabético y el riesgo de eventos según la indicación de la angioplastia coronaria al ingreso (pint 0,045). Conclusiones: En nuestra serie de pacientes tratados con angioplastia coronaria y con seguimiento a largo plazo, los pacientes diabéticos presentaron alto riesgo de eventos cardiovasculares mayores. Este riesgo se observó particularmente incrementado en pacientes DM-IR. Sin embargo, no se evidenciaron diferencias significativas en el riesgo de eventos entre los pacientes DM-NIR y los No-DM.

ABSTRACT Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) has been associated with an increase in adverse outcomes in patients treated with coronary angioplasty, compared to non-diabetic patients. Objective: To evaluate the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in diabetic patients, stratified according to the treatment (non-insulin dependent or insulin-dependent), in a population of unselected patients treated with coronary angioplasty. Methods: Registry-based analysis of patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention from March 2009 to June 2018, according presence of DM stratified according to the established treatment for the metabolic disorder: insulin-dependent DM (ID -DM) and non-insulin dependent DM (NID -DM). An adjusted Cox regression model was applied to evaluate the relationship between the diabetic status and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. Results: A total of 6313 patients were included (mean follow-up 4.1 ± 1.8 years), with a global prevalence of DM of 22,8% (non-insulin dependent DM 19,1%, insulin-dependent DM 3,8%). Diabetic patients showed a higher risk profile, particularly those with ID-DM. At the average follow-up, the adjusted risk of MACE was similar between Non-DM patients and the NIR-DM patients (HR 1,02 [0,81-1,27], p 0.85). In relation to DM-IR patients, it was observed a higher risk of MACE in comparison to Non-DM (HR 1,73 [1,20-2,49], p 0.003) and NIR-DM (HR 1,65 [1,10-2,48], p 0.015). A significant interaction was observed between the diabetic status and the risk of MACE according to the indication of the percutaneous coronary artery intervention (pint 0.045). Conclusions: In our registry of patients undergoing PCI, with long-term follow-up, DM patients had a higher risk of MACE. The risk of MACE was particularly increased in ID-DM patients. However, there were no significant differences in the risk of MACE between DM-NIR and non-DM patients.

Eficiencia y seguridad del acceso radial versus el acceso femoral en la angioplastia coronaria / Efficiency and Safety of Radial Access versus Femoral Access in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

RESUMEN Introducción: El acceso radial se ha asociado a numerosos beneficios en angioplastia coronaria en comparación con el acceso femoral. Sin embargo, múltiples registros internacionales han reportado una escasa adherencia a esta técnica. Objetivos: Evaluar la seguridad, la eficacia y la eficiencia operativa de la angioplastia coronaria según la vía de acceso utilizada y el cuadro clínico del paciente. Métodos: Análisis de registro, unicéntrico y retrospectivo de los pacientes con enfermedad coronaria tratados con angioplastia coronaria desde marzo de 2009 a junio de 2018, según el acceso vascular. Se aplicó un modelo de regresión de Cox ajustado para evaluar la relación entre la vía de acceso y el riesgo de eventos cardiovasculares mayores y un modelo de regresión logística para evaluar la relación con el sangrado mayor y las complicaciones del acceso vascular. La eficiencia operativa se evaluó mediante la medición del tiempo de internación total y los costos totales asociados a esta. Resultados: Se incluyeron 8155 angioplastias coronarias (seguimiento promedio 1448,6 ± 714,1 días), mediante acceso radial (n = 5706) o acceso femoral (n = 2449). A los 30 días, el riesgo de eventos cardiovasculares mayores se redujo significativamente con el acceso radial (HR 0,66 [0,5-0,88], p = 0,004), a expensas de una reducción de la mortalidad total. A su vez, el acceso radial redujo significativamente el riesgo de sangrado mayor (HR 0,33 [0,16- 0,67], p = 0,002) y de complicaciones del acceso vascular (HR 0,72 [0,53-0,98], p = 0,038). Se observó una interacción significativa entre la vía de acceso y el riesgo de eventos según el cuadro clínico al ingreso. Se observó una reducción significativa del tiempo total de internación (≈30%) y de sus costos totales (≈15%) mediante el uso del acceso radial. Conclusiones: El uso del acceso radial en angioplastia coronaria es seguro y eficaz en comparación con el acceso femoral, con menores tasas de eventos cardiovasculares mayores a los 30 días, como, así también, un menor riesgo de sangrado mayor y complicaciones del acceso vascular. Asimismo, el acceso radial se asoció con una mayor eficiencia operativa durante la internación.

ABSTRACT Background: Radial access has been associated with many advantages in percutaneous coronary intervention compared with femoral access. However, many international registries have reported poor adherence to this technique. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy and operational efficiency of percutaneous coronary intervention according to the access site and the clinical presentation of the patient. Methods: A single-center, retrospective registry of patientis with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention was conducted from March 2009 to June 2018 according to the vascular access. A Cox proportional-hazards model was used to analyze the association between vascular access and risk of major cardiovascular eventis, and a logistic regression model was applied to assess the relationship between major bleeding and access site complications. Total hospital stay and total hospitalization costis were measured to evaluate the operational efficiency. Resultis: A total of 8,155 percutaneous coronary interventions (mean follow-up of 1,448.6±714.1 days), via radial access (n=5,706) or femoral access (n=2,449), were included in the study. At 30 days, the risk of major cardiovascular eventis was significantly lower with the radial access (HR 0.66 [0.5-0.88], p=0.004), at the expense of a reduction in all-cause mortal-ity In addition, radial access significantly reduced the risk of major bleeding (HR 0.33 [0.16-0.67], p=0.002) and access site complications (HR 0.72 [0.53-0.98], p=0.038). A significant interaction was observed between the vascular access site and the risk of eventis according to the clinical presentation at admission. Use of radial access was associated with a significant reduction in the length of total hospital stay (≈30%) and total hospitalization costis (≈15%). Conclusions: The use of radial access in percutaneous coronary intervention was safe and effective compared with the femoral access, with lower rates of major cardiovascular eventis at 30 days, lower risk of major bleeding and of access site complications. Moreover, radial access was associated with greater operational efficiency during hospitalization.

Eficacia y seguridad del implante valvular aórtico percutáneo por vía transfemoral bajo anestesia general vs. anestesia local más sedación consciente / Efficacy and Safety of Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement under General Anesthesia versus Local Anesthesia with Conscious Sedation

RESUMEN: Introducción: Actualmente no hay consenso sobre el manejo anestésico más adecuado en el implante valvular aórtico percutáneo por vía transfemoral. Aunque se ha demostrado la factibilidad de concretar el procedimiento bajo anestesia local con sedación consciente o sin esta, los resultados clínicos reportados son controvertidos. Objetivos: Evaluar la seguridad y eficacia del implante valvular aórtico percutáneo por vía transfemoral realizado bajo anestesia general versus anestesia local con sedación consciente. Material y métodos: Análisis unicéntrico y retrospectivo de los pacientes con estenosis aórtica grave sintomática con alto riesgo quirúrgico sometidos a un implante valvular aórtico percutáneo por vía transfemoral desde marzo de 2009 a diciembre de 2016, según el manejo anestésico. Los desenlaces de seguridad y eficacia fueron evaluados a 30 días según las definiciones del Valve Academic Research Consortium-2. Además, se evaluaron los principales tiempos durante la internación. Resultados: Se incluyeron 121 pacientes (Edad 83,2 ± 5,7 años, hombres 48,8%), tratados con un implante valvular aórtico percutáneo por vía transfemoral bajo anestesia general (n = 55, 45,5%) o anestesia local con sedación consciente (n = 66, 54,5%). No se observaron diferencias significativas en los resultados intraprocedimiento ni en los desenlaces de seguridad y eficacia a 30 días. La mortalidad a 30 días fue del 7,3% en el grupo AG y del 3% en el grupo anestesia local con sedación consciente 3%, p log-rank 0,28 (mortalidad global 5%). La necesidad de conversión a anestesia general se presentó en 2 pacientes (3%), por complicaciones vasculares mayores durante el procedimiento. El grupo anestesia local con sedación consciente presentó menor tiempo total de procedimiento, internación en unidad de cuidados intensivos e internación total. Conclusión: El implante valvular aórtico percutáneo por vía transfemoral realizado bajo anestesia local con sedación consciente, parece ser una alternativa segura y eficaz al uso de anestesia general.

Abstract: Background: Currently, there is no consensus about the most adequate anesthetic management in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Although it has been shown that local anesthesia (LA) with or without conscious sedation is feasible, clinical results are controversial. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement performed under general anesthesia versus local anesthesia with conscious sedation. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study of high risk patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement between March 2009 and December 2016. The population was divided according to anesthetic management. Safety and efficacy outcomes were evaluated at 30-days and were classified according to definitions of the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2. In addition, key times during hospitalization were evaluated. Results: A total of 121 patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement under general anesthesia (n=55, 45.5%) or local anesthesia with conscious sedation (n=66, 54.5%). were included in this analysis. Mean age was 83.2±5.7 years and 48.8% were men. There were no differences in either the procedural result or in the 30-day efficacy and safety outcomes. The rate of death at 30-days was 7.3% in the group with general anesthesia and 3% in the local anesthesia with conscious sedation group (log-rank p 0.28). The need of conversion to general anesthesia was 3% (2 patients), in all cases due to major vascular complications during the procedure. In the local anesthesia with conscious sedation group shorter procedural time, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were observed. Conclusions: Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement performed under local anesthesia with conscious sedation seems to be a safe and effective alternative to the use of general anesthesia.

Clinical and Functional Outcome of Percutaneous alcohol septal ablation in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy / Resultados clínicos y funcionales de la ablación septal percutánea con alcohol en la miocardiopatía hipertrófica obstructiva

background: Percutaneous septal ablation is a therapeutic option for patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy refrac-tory to optimal medical therapy. However, results of initial persistence and long-term safety are still controversial. Objectives: The aim of this study was to report percutaneous alcohol septal ablation technique, clinical and functional outcome, cardiovascular events and its impact on long-term follow-up. Methods: A total of 23 patients were included in the study. Functional class (FC), left ventricular outflow tract gradient before and after the procedure and long-term cardiovascular events were evaluated. results: Median follow-up was 52 months (IR 33-72). All patients were in FC III or IV prior to the procedure, under maximum tolerated medical therapy. The procedure was successful in 91% of cases, with 85% of patients currently in FC I and 15% in FC II. Baseline left ventricular outflow tract gradient decreased from 75 mmHg (95% CI 51-89) to 25 mmHg (95% CI 10-37) (p <0.003) and with Valsalva maneuver from 118 mmHg (95% CI 88-152) to 38 mmHg (95% CI 16-69) (p <0.0002), persisting in the long-term follow-up. During hospitalization, two patients presented with complete atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacemaker implantation. No cardiovascular deaths occurred during follow up. Conclusions: Alcohol septal ablation is a promising option for the treatment of a selected population with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, generating sustained clinical and functional improvement with low incidence of events in the long-term follow up.

Evaluación de las revascularizaciones coronarias denominadas inapropiadas por la nueva clasificación de adecuación de procedimientos en un centro cardiovascular de alta complejidad / Evaluation of Inappropriate Coronary Revascularization Procedures According to the New Classification in a Cardiovascular Tertiary Referral Center

Introducción Una revascularización coronaria inapropiada conlleva un riesgo muchas veces evitable para el paciente y se traduce en gastos innecesarios para el sistema de salud. Recientemente, los miembros de un panel de expertos en enfermedades cardiovasculares evaluaron el criterio de adecuación de la indicación de revascularización coronaria en varios escenarios clínicos comunes. Objetivos Identificar la proporción de revascularización coronaria inapropiada tanto percutánea (ATC) como quirúrgica (CRM) conforme al criterio de adecuación en un centro de alta complejidad cardiovascular. Material y métodos Desde enero hasta mayo de 2009 se incluyeron en forma consecutiva todos los pacientes derivados a nuestro centro con la indicación clínica de coronariografía que presentaron enfermedad coronaria significativa (estenosis ≥ 70%) y fueron sometidos a revascularización percutánea o quirúrgica. Se evaluó en este grupo la tasa de indicación inapropiada de revascularización coronaria conforme el criterio de adecuación recientemente publicado. Resultados De 568 cateterismos evaluados, 404 (71,2%) presentaron al menos una lesión ≥ 70% de estenosis, 81 pacientes fueron sometidos a CRM (20%) y 295 a ATC (73%). Del total de 376 pacientes revascularizados, la indicación de revascularización coronaria se consideró inapropiada en 15 (4%), todos ellos del grupo ATC (15/295; 5%), mientras que en el grupo de pacientes multiarteriales (n = 172) sólo 2 (1,2%) revascularizaciones resultaron inapropiadas. Conclusiones El criterio de adecuación de revascularización coronaria (percutánea o quirúrgica) en un centro cardiovascular de alta complejidad ha resultado inapropiado en una minoría de los casos. Dicho criterio representa una herramienta potencialmente aplicable tanto en la toma de decisiones en pacientes con enfermedad coronaria como en el control de calidad de los servicios de cardiología.

Background Inappropriate use of revascularization may be potentially harmful to patients and generate unwarranted costs to the health care system. Recently, the members of an expert panel conducted an appropriateness review of common clinical scenarios in which coronary revascularization is frequently considered. Objectives To identify the proportion of inappropriate coronary revascularization procedures -percutaneous (PTCA) and surgical (CABG) - in a cardiovascular tertiary referral center according to appropriateness criterion. Material and Methods We consecutively included all patients referred to our center for coronary angiography from January to May 2009 with a significant coronary stenosis (≥ 70%) who underwent percutaneous or surgical revascularization, and evaluated the rate of inappropriate revascularization according to appropriateness criterion recently published. Results From a total of 568 coronary angiographies, 404 (71.2%) had at least a coronary stenosis ≥70%; 81 patients underwent CABGS (20%) and 295 PTCA (73%). In these 376 revascularized patients, the indication was considered inappropriate in 15 (4%), all of them in the PTCA group (15/295; 5%), while only 2 patients with multivessel disease (n=172, 1.2%) underwent inappropriate revascularization. Conclusions In a cardiovascular tertiary referral center, the proportion of inappropriate coronary revascularization procedures (percutaneous or surgical) was low. Appropriateness criterion may be an applicable tool for decision-making in patients with coronary artery disease and for quality control in the departments of cardiology.

Predictores de reperfusión miocárdica tisular luego de la angioplastia en el infarto agudo de miocardio / Predictors of Myocardial Tissue Reperfusion after Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Introducción La angioplastia primaria tiene una eficacia limitada ya que deja a un grupo considerable de pacientes sin lograr una reperfusión miocárdica tisular adecuada. Los factores clínicos, angiográficos y terapéuticos que influyen en el grado de reperfusión no han sido claramente establecidos. Objetivos Identificar los factores independientes asociados con la ausencia de reperfusión tisular luego de la angioplastia primaria. Material y métodos Se analizaron 140 pacientes incluidos prospectivamente en el estudio aleatorizado Protection of Distal Embolization in High-Risk Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Trial (PREMIAR). Este estudio evaluó la utilización de un filtro de protección distal durante la angioplastia en el infarto agudo de miocardio con supradesnivel del segmento ST en pacientes de alto riesgo trombótico (solamente incluyendo flujo coronario basal TIMI 0-2). El punto final primario fue la resolución completa del segmento ST a los 60 minutos, definida como disminución del ST ≥ 70% con el empleo de monitorización continua del segmento ST. Se desarrolló un modelo de regresión logística para identificar los predictores independientes. Resultados Se observó resolución completa del segmento ST a los 60 minutos luego de la angioplastia en 82 pacientes (63%), mientras que 53 pacientes (37%) presentaron resolución incompleta que se asoció con una tasa de mortalidad, reinfarto y/o insuficiencia cardíaca a los 30 días del 8,5% y 18,9%, respectivamente (p = 0,07). Los pacientes que no lograron una reperfusión tisular adecuada tuvieron con más frecuencia compromiso de localización anterior (79% versus 33%; p = 0,001), mayor frecuencia cardíaca (81 ± 20 versus 70 ± 15; p < 0,001) y menor proporción de fumadores actuales (25% versus 51%; p = 0,002) respecto de aquellos con reperfusión tisular óptima. Se observó además una tendencia a mayor presencia de diabetes (26% versus 16%; p = 0,13), mayor tiempo desde el inicio de los síntomas a la angioplastia (minutos) (217 ± 167 versus 182 ± 134; p = 0,19) y clase Killip > 1 (30% versus 17%; p = 0,07), respectivamente. El análisis multivariado demostró que el infarto de localización anterior (OR 8,22, IC 95% 3,67-18,4; p < 0,001) se asoció con ausencia de reperfusión completa, mientras que el uso de inhibidores de la glicoproteína IIb/IIIa (OR 4,21, IC 95% 1,34-13,22; p = 0,014) y el tabaquismo actual (OR 3,84, IC 95% 1,58-9,50; p = 0,003) se correlacionaron con una reperfusión completa. Conclusiones Una proporción considerable de pacientes sometidos a angioplastia primaria no logran una reperfusión tisular adecuada. Este fenómeno se asocia con peor pronóstico. La presencia de infarto de localización anterior se correlaciona con una extensión menor del grado de reperfusión tisular. Contrariamente, el tabaquismo actual y el uso de inhibidores de la glicoproteína IIb/IIIa se asocian con una reperfusión tisular más profunda luego de la angioplastia primaria.

Background The efficacy of primary angioplasty is limited due to the fact that a considerable number of patients do not achieve adequate levels of myocardial tissue perfusion. The degree of reperfusion depends on multiple clinical, angiographic and therapeutic factors. Objectives To identify the independent factors associated with the absence of myocardial tissue reperfusion after primary angioplasty. Material and Methods A total of 140 patients included in the Protection of Distal Embolization in High-Risk Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Trial (PREMIAR) were analyzed. This study evaluated the use of filter distal protection device during angioplasty in patients with acute STsegment elevation myocardial infarction at high risk of thrombosis (only including baseline TIMI grade 0-2 flow). The primary end point of the study was the rate of complete ST-segment resolution at 60 minutes, defined as ≥ 70% recovery compared with baseline during continuous ST-segment monitoring. A model of logistic regression was developed to identify independent predictors. Results Complete resolution of ST-segment deviation 60 minutes after angioplasty was observed in 82 patients (63%), while 53 patients (37%) presented partial ST-segment resolution which was associated with rates of mortality, reinfarction and/or heart failure at 30 days of 8.5% and 18.9%, respectively (p=0.07). The variables associated with absence of adequate myocardial tissue reperfusion were anterior infarction (79% versus 33%; p=0.001), higher heart rate (81±20 versus 70±15; p=0.001) and history of current smoking (25% versus 51%; p=0.002), compared to optimal tissue reperfusion. In addition, there was a trend towards greater prevalence of diabetes (26% versus 16%; p=0.13), longer time interval from the onset of symptoms to angioplasty (minutes) (217±167 versus 182±134; p=0.19) and Killip class >1 (30% versus 17%; p=0.07), respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that anterior myocardial infarction was associated with absence of complete reperfusion (OR 8.22, 95% CI 3.67-18.4; p<0.001), while the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (OR 4.21, 95% CI 1.34-13.22; p=0.014) and current smoking (OR 3.84, 95% CI 1.58-9.50; p=0.003) correlated with complete reperfusion. Conclusions A considerable proportion of patients undergoing primary angioplasty do not achieve adequate myocardial tissue reperfusion. This phenomenon is associated with adverse outcomes. Anterior myocardial infarction correlates with less degree of tissue reperfusion. Conversely, current smoking and the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors are associated with better tissue reperfusion after primary angioplasty.

Reemplazo valvular aórtico percutáneo en pacientes de alto riesgo quirúrgico / Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients

Una proporción importante de pacientes con estenosis aórtica (EAo) grave poseen comorbilidades que incrementan el riesgo de la cirugía de reemplazo valvular aórtico. El implante percutáneo de válvula protésica surge como una alternativa en este grupo de pacientes. Se comunican dos casos de pacientes de edad avanzada portadores de EAo grave a los que se les realizó con éxito el implante percutáneo de una prótesis valvular aórtica CoreValve y se describen los criterios para la selección de pacientes y la técnica de implante percutáneo.

A significant proportion of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) have comorbidities that increase the risk of surgical aortic valve replacement. Percutaneous implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis emerges as an alternative in this group of patients. We report two cases of elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis that underwent successful percutaneous implantation of CoreValve aortic valve prostheses; in addition, criteria for patient selection and the technique of the procedure are described.

Protection of Distal Embolization in High-Risk Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (PREMIAR).

Distal embolization may decrease myocardial reperfusion after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Nonetheless, results of previous trials assessing the role of distal protection during primary PCI have been controversial. The Protection of Distal Embolization in High-Risk Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Trial (PREMIAR) was a prospective, randomized, controlled study designed to evaluate the role of filter-based distal protection during PCI in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction at high risk of embolic events (including only baseline Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 0 to 2 flow). The primary end point was continuous monitoring of ST-segment resolution. Secondary end points included core laboratory analysis of angiographic myocardial blush, ejection fraction measured by cardiac ultrasound, and adverse cardiac events at 6 months. From a total of 194 enrolled patients, 140 subjects were randomized to PCI with or without embolic protection, and 54 were included in a registry arm due to the presence of angiographic exclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics were comparable between arms. The rate of complete ST-segment resolution (>or=70%) at 60 minutes was similar in patients treated with or without distal protection (61.2% vs 60.3%, respectively, p = 0.85). Angiographic myocardial blush (67% vs 70.7%, p = 0.73), in-hospital ejection fraction (47.4 +/- 9.9% vs 45.3 +/- 7.3%, p = 0.29), and combined end point of death, heart failure, or reinfarction at 6 months (14.3% vs 15.7%, p = 0.81) were consistently achieved in a similar proportion in the 2 groups. In conclusion, the use of filter-based distal protection is safe and effectively retrieves debris; however, such use does not translate into an improvement of myocardial reperfusion, left ventricular performance, or clinical outcomes.

Intravascular thermographic assessment in human coronary atherosclerotic plaques by a novel flow-occluding sensing catheter: a safety and feasibility study.

OBJECTIVE: To report the safety and feasibility of a new occluding thermographic catheter in patients with coronary artery disease. BACKGROUND: Although plaque temperature heterogeneity is shown in atheromatous plaques, significant underestimation is encountered due to the cooling effect of the uninterrupted blood flow. METHODS: The catheter was positioned at the stenotic site. Blood flow was interrupted by an expandable braid located at the distal portion of the catheter. Then, thermographic assessment was performed. RESULTS: In one patient, the catheter could not reach the lesion due to tortuosity. Of the 20 lesions evaluated, 5 were excluded due to unsuccessful interruption of blood flow. We identified 5 lesions with a 0.3 degrees Celcius elevations compared to the same site without interruption of blood flow. There were no procedural complications. CONCLUSION: The new catheter-occluding thermographic device, while avoiding the blood flow cooling effect, appears to be safe and feasible for the assessment of human plaque temperature heterogeneity.

ST-segment resolution 60 minutes after combination treatment of abciximab with reteplase or reteplase alone for acute myocardial infarction (30-day mortality results from the resolution of ST-segment after reperfusion therapy substudy).

The combination of abciximab with thrombolytic therapy when treating acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction has been hypothesized to enhance microvascular perfusion. Resolution of ST-segment elevation after thrombolytic therapy is believed to be a marker of myocardial reperfusion and to predict mortality rate. Among 16,588 patients enrolled in the Fifth Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries in Acute Myocardial Infarction trial, 1,764 consecutive patients from selected centers had their study electrocardiograms evaluated by a core laboratory for ST-segment deviation resolution 60 minutes after treatment. Patients were categorized into 4 groups: complete resolution (>70%), partial resolution (<70% to 30%), no resolution (<30%), and worsening ST-segment deviation. Patients treated with reteplase or a combination of reteplase plus abciximab had similar rates of complete resolution (32% vs 34%), partial resolution (29% vs 27%), no resolution (15% vs 16%), and worsening ST-segment elevation (23 vs 23%; p = 0.59). The 30-day mortality rates in these 4 groups were 2.1%, 5.2%, 5.5%, and 8.1% (p <0.001). Even after accounting for baseline variables, incomplete ST-segment resolution (<70%) was associated with an increased risk of death within 30 days (adjusted hazard ratio 2.41, 95% confidence interval 1.25 to 4.63, p <0.008). Thus, ST-segment resolution at 60 minutes was no different in patients treated with full-dose reteplase from those treated with a combination of abciximab and reteplase. Patients with >70% ST-segment resolution within 60 minutes had markedly decreased mortality rates, irrespective of treatment.

Clopidogrel is associated with better in-hospital and 30-day outcomes than ticlopidine after coronary stenting.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports of fatal ticlopidine-induced blood dyscrasias have led many interventional cardiologists to administer clopidogrel instead of ticlopidine for coronary stenting. Most studies have demonstrated similar outcomes and a more favourable safety profile supporting this change in practice patterns. OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical outcomes in patients who received clopidogrel rather than ticlopidine after coronary stenting. METHODS: Between June 1996 and December 1998, 652 patients received a clopidogrel-based periprocedural regimen (300 mg loading dose followed by 75 mg daily in addition to acetylsalicylic acid 325 mg daily) and 1717 patients received a ticlopidine-based regimen (500 mg loading dose followed by 250 mg bid in addition to acetylsalicylic acid 325 mg daily). In-hospital and 30-day outcomes were assessed in the two groups. RESULTS: At 30 days, unadjusted mortality was 0.3% in the clopidogrel group versus 1.5% in the ticlopidine group, and myocardial infarction (MI) was also reduced in the clopidogrel group (4.0% versus 6.5%). No difference was found in the rate of repeat revascularization (1.4% versus 1.2%). The combination of death/MI/repeat revascularization at 30 days was reduced by 32%, an absolute difference of 2.9% (6.2% versus 9.1%). On multivariate analysis, clopidogrel was found to be an independent predictor of freedom from nonfatal MI (odds ratio [OR] 0.64, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.99, P=0.04), the composite of death or MI (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.95, P=0.03) and the composite of death/MI/revascularization (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.00, P=0.05). CONCLUSION: After coronary stenting, in a large, nonrandomized, consecutive patient experience, clopidogrel appears to be associated with more favourable clinical outcomes than ticlopidine, without increasing the risk of bleeding or peripheral vascular complications.

Comportamiento funcional de lesiones de grado intermedio. Evaluación mediante Doppler intracoronario, angiografía digital y estudio de perfusión con imágenes tomográficas / Functional behavior of intermediate coronary stenoses. Assessment by intracoronary Doppler, digital angiography and tomographic stress perfusion imaging

Muchos son los factores anatómicos y fisiopatológicos que influyen en el comportamiento funcional de las lesiones de grado intermedio, generando dificultad para su evaluación por angiografía digital. En este trabajo se compara la evaluación de la severidad funcional de este tipo de lesiones mediante el flujo de reserva coronaria utilizando el Doppler intracoronario, la estimación visual y parámetros obtenidos de la angiografía digital, comparándolos con los estudios de perfusión tomográficos. Se observa el limitado papel de las determinaciones angiográficas para evaluar fisiológicamente las lesiones de grado intermedio. Se evidencia la gran utilidad del Doppler intracoronario en la determinación funcional de estas lesiones, demostrada por la elevada correlación con los resultados de los estudios de perfusión tomográficos (AU)

Comportamiento funcional de lesiones de grado intermedio. Evaluación mediante Doppler intracoronario, angiografía digital y estudio de perfusión con imágenes tomográficas / Functional behavior of intermediate coronary stenoses. Assessment by intracoronary Doppler, digital angiography and tomographic stress perfusion imaging

Muchos son los factores anatómicos y fisiopatológicos que influyen en el comportamiento funcional de las lesiones de grado intermedio, generando dificultad para su evaluación por angiografía digital. En este trabajo se compara la evaluación de la severidad funcional de este tipo de lesiones mediante el flujo de reserva coronaria utilizando el Doppler intracoronario, la estimación visual y parámetros obtenidos de la angiografía digital, comparándolos con los estudios de perfusión tomográficos. Se observa el limitado papel de las determinaciones angiográficas para evaluar fisiológicamente las lesiones de grado intermedio. Se evidencia la gran utilidad del Doppler intracoronario en la determinación funcional de estas lesiones, demostrada por la elevada correlación con los resultados de los estudios de perfusión tomográficos